Contact us

Author name: jgreen

A comparison graphic showing discharge capacity over 100 cycles for three assembly methods. Left: manually assembled coin cells with three lines that diverge and decline significantly. Centre: automatically assembled coin cells with three lines that remain more consistent and decline more slowly. Right: automatically assembled Protocells with three nearly overlapping lines that remain highly stable. Icons above illustrate manual work, the automated CASS system, and the Protocell format. Cellerate logo appears at the bottom.

Protocells by Cellerate

Blog /

Protocells: Reliability, Precision & Flexibility for Battery Researchers Battery researchers have relied on coin cells for decades, but the format often limits how well laboratory results translate to real-world pouch cells. Variations in stack pressure, sealing, and electrode alignment can all affect performance data, making it harder to compare results or scale discoveries. Cellerate developed […]

Protocells by Cellerate Read More »

How Vianode Increased Cell Yield and Lab Efficiency with Cellerate Automation

Blog /

How Vianode Increased Cell Yield and Lab Efficiency with Cellerate Automation Discover how a leading synthetic graphite manufacturer scaled their R&D output and improved data reliability, without increasing hiring more staff. “Cellerate enabled us to test more materials, with fewer people, and more confidence in our data.” — Vianode R&D Team The Challenge: Manual Coin

How Vianode Increased Cell Yield and Lab Efficiency with Cellerate Automation Read More »

Scroll to Top